Authors
Andrew D. Choi, MD FSCCT1; Suhny Abbara MD, MSCCT2; Kelley R. Branch, MD, FSCCT3; Gudrun M. Feuchtner MD4; Brian Ghoshhajra MD, FSCCT5; Koen Nieman MD, PhD, FSCCT6, Gianluca Pontone, MD, PhD, FSCCT7; Todd C. Villines, MD, MSCCT8; Michelle C. Williams, MBChB, PhD, FSCCT9; Ron Blankstein, MD, MSCCT10
Use of cardiac computed tomography amidst the COVID-19 pandemic
Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC)
Updated: May 13, 2020
The world is currently suffering through a pandemic outbreak of severe respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) known as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). The United States (US) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) currently advises medical facilities to “reschedule non-urgent outpatient visits as necessary” 1.
The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, the United Kingdom National Health Service and several other international agencies covering Asia, North America and most regions of the world have recommended similar “social distancing” measures2, 3.
The Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) offers guidance that fully support and extend these international recommendations specifically for cardiac CT (CCT) practitioners to decrease risk of COVID-19 transmission in their facilities while
allowing for optimal timing considerations for effective utilization of CCT to improve cardiovascular health outcomes. While many institutions will have their own guidelines for clinicians and imagers to follow, these recommendations are meant
to help CCT labs which are interested in developing or refining such policies. It is important to emphasize the SCCT’s commitment to the health and well-being of CCT technologists, imagers, trainees, and research community, as well as the patients
served by CCT by preventing the spread of disease.
As this represents initial guidance for a rapidly evolving pandemic, the SCCT advises that CCT practitioners work closely with their referring physicians to determine the appropriateness and timing of each individual study on a case by case basis, while also considering the local epidemiology of COVID-19 and local institutional guidelines for practice.
Download a statement as a PDF
Basic concepts
- Social distancing — keeping at least six feet (1.8 meters) between individuals in waiting rooms and work spaces as much as feasible.
- Encourage sick employees to stay home. Personnel who develop respiratory symptoms (e.g., cough, shortness of breath) or unexplained fever
should be instructed not to report to work.
- Ensure that your sick leave policies are flexible and consistent with public health guidance and that employees are aware of these policies. Make contingency plans for increased absenteeism
- Screen patients and visitors for symptoms of acute respiratory illness (e.g., fever, cough, difficulty breathing) or gastrointestinal symptoms and coronavirus exposure in the last 2 weeks before entering one’s healthcare facility
4.
- Ensure technologist and CCT imager hand hygiene best practices. If soap and water are not readily available, use of a hand sanitizer that contains at least 60% alcohol.
- Consider standard droplet precautions for patients and healthcare personnel as per institutional infection control protocols.
- Increase scheduling intervals or appointment times to allow adequate time to clean equipment as needed.
- Leverage telemedicine technologies and isolated workstations to allow for reading and interpretation, that allow for social distancing to limit staff exposure, when possible.
- Assign a team member to monitor and incorporate regular updates from the CDC and appropriate regional jurisdictions.
Patients under investigation (PUI) and confirmed COVID-19
In patients under investigation (PUI) and with confirmed COVID-19, the benefit of CCT scanning in most clinical scenarios will likely be lower than the risk of COVID-19 exposure and infection to healthcare personnel. These cases should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
For these PUI and confirmed COVID-19 patients in which CCT scanning is determined to be necessary, the following issues should be considered:
- Ensure proper use of personal protection equipment (PPE). Healthcare personnel including technologists, radiologists and cardiac imagers who come in close contact with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 should wear the appropriate personal protective equipment5, 6. Patients should wear a surgical mask during imaging to ensure standard droplet precautions.
- Appropriate environmental cleaning and decontamination of rooms by thorough cleaning of the surfaces by a staff member with appropriate PPE as per CDC and local institutional guidelines for airborne viral diseases7.
-
Cardiac CT indications and timing
To advise practitioners of cardiovascular CT on how to implement the CDC recommendation of rescheduling non-urgent visits as necessary and international guidelines on social distancing, the SCCT offers the following guiding points (Table 1) and suggestions for CCT timing based on various indications (Table 2). As this is not an exhaustive list, the SCCT advises CCT practitioners to work with referring physicians on a case by case basis.
Table 1:
Guiding points to consider when deciding on the role and timing of CCT.
- The delivery of CCT services should be performed in a manner which will be safe to technologists and imagers, as well as patients.
|
- Consider deferring CCT exams which can be safely postponed in order to minimize risk of exposure to patients and staff.
|
- CCT may be preferred to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in order to rule-out left atrial appendage and intracardiac thrombus prior to cardioversion in order to reduce coughing and aerosolization related to TEE.
|
- The ability of CCT to decisively exclude coronary disease or high risk anatomy may prevent the need for inpatient admissions and resource use.
|
- Consider that elderly patients, those with co-morbidities, and those who may be immunosuppressed are at greater risk of morbidity / mortality from COVID-19, and the benefit a
nd risk of cardiac CT should be evaluated on a case by case basis.
|
- In patients under investigation (PUI) and with confirmed COVID-19, the benefit of CCT in most clinical scenarios will likely be lower than the risk of exposure and infection to healthcare personnel. These cases should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
|
Table 2:
Timing considerations for common indications for CCT amidst COVID-19
| |
Elective Indications
(May be rescheduled > 8
weeks)
|
Semi-Urgent Indications (Consider scanning within 4 - 8 weeks)
|
Urgent Indications
(Consider scanning within hours to < 2 - 4 weeks)
|
| CAD
|
- Asymptomatic coronary artery calcium imaging
|
|
- Acute chest pain when sufficient clinical suspicion for CAD
- Stable chest pain at high risk for events, or when there is concern for possible high-risk coronary anatomy
|
- Stable chest pain without high suspicion for CAD
|
| SHD
|
- Stable structural heart patients (eg TAVR, TMVR, LAA closure in conjunction with Heart Team)*
|
- Patient requiring urgent structural intervention (eg, TAVR, TMVR, LAA closure)
|
| A-FIB
|
- Pulmonary vein assessment for A-Fib Ablation planning*
|
- Evaluation of left atrial appendage in chronic
atrial arrhythmia prior to restoration of sinus rhythm
|
- Evaluation of left atrial appendage in acute
atrial arrhythmia prior to restoration of sinus rhythm+
|
| Heart Failure
|
- Stable cardiomyopathy patients
|
- Acute inpatient cardiomyopathy in low to intermediate pretest probability of CAD, only if CCT would change management
- Evaluation of LVAD dysfunction
|
| Valvular
|
- Evaluation for aortic stenosis severity
|
- Sub-acute to chronic prosthetic valve dysfunction
|
- Acute symptomatic prosthetic heart valve dysfunction, endocarditis, perivalvular extension of endocarditis or possible valve abscess
|
| Masses/Congenital
|
- Cardiac masses, which are suspected to be benign or unlikely to plan biopsy or surgery
|
- New cardiac masses which are suspected to be malignant, if necessary to plan biopsy or surgery
- Rule-out left ventricular thrombus following equivocal echocardiography when alternative diagnostic tests (e.g. MRI) are not feasible
|
- Elective evaluation of congenital anatomy
|
|
*Especially in institutions that will delay such elective cases. + When cardioversion is deemed necessary.
CAD = coronary artery disease; SHD = structural heart disease; A-Fib = atrial fibrillation; LAA = left atrial appendage; TAVR = transcatheter aortic valve replacement/implantation; TMVR = transcatheter mitral valve replacement/implantation; LVAD = left ventricular assist device
LISTen TO THE AUTHORS DISCUSS THIS DOCUMENT ON THE JCCT PULSE PODCAST
Have a question or information to add? Post it in our COVID-19 forum.
#CCTA for Myocardial Injury and Possible ACS in known or suspected COVID-19
- Coronary CTA (CCTA) may be useful in carefully selected patients who have elevated cardiac enzymes, inconclusive electrocardiogram, and symptoms of possible acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in order to exclude obstructive coronary artery disease.
- The use of coronary CTA in such settings should only be considered if it can be performed at centers that have high-level of expertise and when diagnostic quality imaging can be achieved. Furthermore, CTA in this setting should only be considered if it expected to result in a meaningful change to patient management or outcomes.
- CCTA is not recommended to evaluate patients with definitive ST elevation myocardial infarction. These should proceed directly to definitive therapy as per local institutional protocol.
Initial experience in COVID-19(+) patients suggest that at least 7-20% of hospitalized patients have elevated troponin levels8-11. In such patients the differential diagnosis may include ACS, myocarditis, or myocardial injury12, 13. The use of coronary CTA in such settings should only be considered if it can be performed at centers that have high-level of expertise and when diagnostic quality imaging can be achieved. CCTA in this setting should only be considered if it is expected to result in a meaningful change to patient management or outcomes, as well as reduce resource utilization (i.e. avoid invasive angiography). Depending on the available technology, patients with elevated heart rates, and those who may not be able to perform a proper breath-hold may not be suitable candidates for coronary CTA.
The decision to proceed with coronary CTA versus invasive angiography should be made in collaboration with local clinical staff from the Heart Team, including cardiac catheterization laboratory. It is expected for the vast majority of COVID-19(+) patients, invasive or non-invasive coronary visualization will not change management.
Incidental pulmonary findings in patients at risk of COVID-19 exposure
COVID-19 is a viral pneumonia, with a spectrum of findings ranging from normal lungs to acute respiratory distress syndrome. Typical chest CT findings in known cases are described elsewhere14, 15. If typical or atypical pulmonary findings are encountered, consultation with a radiologist with thoracic expertise is encouraged, and appropriate documentation and timely communication of these findings is important, especially in cases not known or suspected to have the disease.
∏
Additional considerations for Cardiac CT and Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease
- Cardiac CT may enable evaluation of cardiac and extra-cardiac anatomy for conditions deemed by the Congenital Heart Team to be of clinical, hemodynamic and/or or surgical relevance prior to urgent intervention to include, but not limited to assessment of suspected following conditions: significant coronary artery anomaly, coronary artery course in proximity to the right ventricular outflow tract, thoracic vasculature abnormality, pulmonary vasculature obstruction16, 17, 18.
The impact of COVID-19 in pediatric patients are significantly reduced (<1%) when compared to the adult and elderly population, yet over 15% of children may be asymptomatic carriers19, 20. Patients with unrepaired or palliated congenital heart disease may constitute a high-risk group, though current evidence is uncertain. Cardiac CT in patients with congenital heart disease should be reserved for scenarios in which it is expected to provide unique diagnostic information, at centers with high expertise and at minimal risk.
€
Safe Reintroduction of Cardiovascular Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Guidance from North American Society Leadership including SCCT
As written in the
Wood, et al statement20:
There should be a sustained reduction in the rate of new COVID-19 admissions and deaths in the relevant geographic area for a prespecified time interval as determined by local public health officials before
changes can be implemented. Importantly, if COVID-19 admissions and deaths start to increase, there must be immediate and transparent cessation of most elective invasive procedures and tests. Resumption of these services would occur in collaboration
with regional public health policy makers. As discussed below, COVID-19 testing of potential patients and health care workers (HCW), as well as personal protective equipment (PPE), must also be carefully monitored to minimize the risk of shortages
as the pandemic escalates and abates.
Table adapted from Wood, et al20.
|
Response Level
(in collaboration with public health officials)
|
Level 2
Reintroduction of some services
|
Level 1
Reintroduction of most services
|
Level 0
Regular services
(ongoing COVID-19 testing/surveillance and monitoring of PPE availability)
|
|
CT Coronary Angiography
|
- All inpatients and selective symptomatic outpatients
|
- Majority of cases
- Stable cases may still be deferred
|
Routine service for all cases
|
|
Structural Heart Disease
|
- Preprocedural structural heart disease planning for all inpatients and selective outpatients
|
- Majority of cases
- Stable cases may still be deferred
|
Routine service for all cases
|
|
Other
|
Selective cases:
- Pulmonary vein assessment for AF ablation planning
- Cardiac masses
- Congenital heart disease
|
- Majority of cases
- Stable cases may still be deferred
|
Routine service for all cases
|
Conclusion
As this situation is shifting rapidly, the information contained within this document is likely to evolve.SCCT will maintain an updated version of this statement as more information becomes available on the Society’s website.SCCT
advises that members keep informed regarding future updates from the medical and radiological communities on protecting patients, staff, trainees and providers from COVID-19 while deciding on the optimal timing of outpatient and inpatient CCT exams.
SCCT among societies asking for more coverage during this trying time. Read more.
Other Resources:
References
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Steps Healthcare Facilities Can Take Now to Prepare for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: COVID-19
- NHS England: Coronavirus guidance for clinicians
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: What Healthcare Personnel Should Know about Caring for Patients with Confirmed or Possible COVID-19 Infection
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Infection Control
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Healthcare Settings
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Environmental Infection Control Guidelines
- Lippi G, Lavie CJ, Sanchis-Gomar F. Cardiac troponin I in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Evidence from a meta-analysis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020.
- Januzzi JL. Troponin and BNP Use in COVID-19 2020 [updated March 18, 2020. Available from: https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2020/03/18/15/25/troponin-and-bnp-use-in-covid19.
- Shi S, Qin M, Shen B, Cai Y, Liu T, Yang F, et al. Association of Cardiac Injury With Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol. 2020.
- Driggin E, Madhavan MV, Bikdeli B, Chuich T, Laracy J, Bondi-Zoccai G, et al. Cardiovascular Considerations for Patients, Health Care Workers, and Health Systems During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020.
- Linde JJ, Kelbaek H, Hansen TF, Sigvardsen PE, Torp-Pedersen C, Bech J, et al. Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(5):453-63.
- Smulders MW, Kietselaer B, Wildberger JE, Dagnelie PC, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Mingels AMA, et al. Initial Imaging-Guided Strategy Versus Routine Care in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(20):2466-77.
- Mossa-Basha M, Meltzer CC, Kim DC, Tuite MJ, Kolli KP, Tan BS. Radiology Department Preparedness for COVID-19: Radiology Scientific Expert Panel. Radiology. 2020:200988.
- British Society of Thoracic Imaging: COVID-19 Resources
- Morray BH, G.B., Crystal MA, Goldstein BH, Quereshi AM, Torres AJ, Epstein SM, Crittendon I, Ing FF, Sathanandam SK, Resource Allocation and Decision Making for Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Catheterization During the Novel
Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Pandemic: A U.S. Multi-Institutional Perspective. Journal of Invasive Cardiology, 2020. 32.
- Han, B.K., et al., Computed Tomography Imaging in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease Part I: Rationale and Utility. An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT): Endorsed by the
Society of Pediatric Radiology (SPR) and the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging (NASCI). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2015. 9(6): p. 475-92.
- Stephens, E.H., et al., COVID-19: Crisis Management in Congenital Heart Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg, 2020.
- Cruz, A.T. and S.L. Zeichner, COVID-19 in Children: Initial Characterization of the Pediatric Disease. Pediatrics, 2020.
- Wood DA, M.E., Thourani VH, Sathananthan J, Virani A, Poppas A, Harrington RA, Dearani JA, Swaminathan M, Russo AM, Blankstein R, Dorbala S, Carr J, Virani S, Gin K, Packard A, Dilsizian V, Legare J-F, Leipsic J, Webb JG, Krahn
AD, Safe Reintroduction of Cardiovascular Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Guidance from North American Society Leadership. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2020. May 2020.
Author reference
1Division of Cardiology & Department of Radiology, The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States
2Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
3 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States
4Department of Radiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Vienna, Austria
5 Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
6 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
7 Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, University of Milan, Italy
8Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, United States
9University of Edinburgh/British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
10 Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Departments of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division) and Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
# New section amended to the original statement on April 15, 2020 that represents Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography guidance only.
∏ The writing group would like to acknowledge Dr. Kanwal M. Farooqi, MD of Columbia University, New York, NY for her contributions. This section was amended to the original statement on May 13, 2020 that represents Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography guidance only.
€ New section amended to the original statement on May 13, 2020.